Lest I wind up in jail for trying not to wind up in jail...
(Get the background story for this update here: http://mattforney.com/rachel-haywire-scammed-trigger-warning/)
I have no evidence that Rachel Haywire actually misused any funds from the Trigger Warning Indiegogo campaign. For all I know she has a perfectly lovely and organized accounting ledger which she just never let me see because... er, because...
Yeah, that's where my mind kept getting stuck. She told me about all the crazy expenses she had doled out for, but none of it made much sense, and a ledger was never proffered.
Let me repeat: I never saw proof of what happened with the finances.
There were all kinds of frightening indications that she might have spent all the money on God knows what: Her lame excuses for stalling in paying me for my writing and labor; her insistence that I take half the money now and get the other half after continuing to work for her for an indefinite length of time; her admission during our last Skype call that she was pretty much broke; her suggestion that she and I take any extra "mad money" and go on a sexcation to see some guy she was interested in, presumably with me as wing girl.
Therefore, I moved to expose her not because I was certain she had committed any crime, but because there were enough indications to make me afraid she might have. And considering her past behavior toward myself and others, I had reason to suspect she would try to pin the blame on me should the shit hit the fan.
The bottom line: I wanted to make public the fact that I never saw the money, and I was never allowed to touch the money or see any financial records; for all I know Rachel has virtuously put it in a trust fund for the magazine or invested it in gold bonds for the future. So for your sake and mine, avoid all slander, libel, etc.
Thanks, and have a nut-job-free day! I know I will. Ahhhhhhh, that feels good.
(Get the background story for this update here: http://mattforney.com/rachel-haywire-scammed-trigger-warning/)
I have no evidence that Rachel Haywire actually misused any funds from the Trigger Warning Indiegogo campaign. For all I know she has a perfectly lovely and organized accounting ledger which she just never let me see because... er, because...
Yeah, that's where my mind kept getting stuck. She told me about all the crazy expenses she had doled out for, but none of it made much sense, and a ledger was never proffered.
Let me repeat: I never saw proof of what happened with the finances.
There were all kinds of frightening indications that she might have spent all the money on God knows what: Her lame excuses for stalling in paying me for my writing and labor; her insistence that I take half the money now and get the other half after continuing to work for her for an indefinite length of time; her admission during our last Skype call that she was pretty much broke; her suggestion that she and I take any extra "mad money" and go on a sexcation to see some guy she was interested in, presumably with me as wing girl.
Therefore, I moved to expose her not because I was certain she had committed any crime, but because there were enough indications to make me afraid she might have. And considering her past behavior toward myself and others, I had reason to suspect she would try to pin the blame on me should the shit hit the fan.
The bottom line: I wanted to make public the fact that I never saw the money, and I was never allowed to touch the money or see any financial records; for all I know Rachel has virtuously put it in a trust fund for the magazine or invested it in gold bonds for the future. So for your sake and mine, avoid all slander, libel, etc.
Thanks, and have a nut-job-free day! I know I will. Ahhhhhhh, that feels good.
It sucks that you got scammed by Rachel Haywire, but unfortunately, she's a known quantity. Historically she literally just comes up with some shitty idea, obsesses over it for a while then runs off once enough people realize she's just a garbage human being. Now, it's difficult because the people who tend to realize this often get very anti-semitic and racist, so it's hard to see what's actually the problem. But ultimately she's a hack, believes in inevitable race wars(because she dates white supremacists). She's also a lying drug abusing bourgie-ass poser. Again, I'm sorry you got scammed. But she literally makes her nut doing this shit. and then claims to be a great uniter by trying to get morons at rags Taki mag to be even slightly progressive. It's adorable to watch though. I think this would make great television. watch weird misogynists and racists get scammed by the great jewish hope!
ReplyDelete...Rachel believes in race wars? Didn't she say in her Medium article that one of the reasons she left the Dork Enlightenment was that she wasn't happy with all the race-focused stuff? Maybe you know something I don't.
DeleteBelieve me, I feel like a prize moron... As the title of my blog implies, I try not to pay too much attention to the Intertube flotsam and jetsam. Boy, did it bite me in the ass this time.
DeleteAs Harlan Ellison once wrote, "it's easy to be smart...later."
DeleteGood luck in all you do.
Thanks! I'd like to be smart earlier next time. As I've said elsewhere, I need to quit giving people who are unintentionally entertaining the benefit of the doubt. I feel affection for their goofiness and then comes the knife.
DeleteJames Williamson of Creation Books (himself a scammer and a thief, but I go off piste) once said that the trouble with the counterculture is that most of the people are in it for a reason - chiefly because they're seven beers short of a six pack and the underground is a place where being crazy is tolerated and sometimes even celebrated.
ReplyDeleteIt's too bad that funny-crazy (like writing Naked Lunch) so often goes along with not-funny-crazy (like shooting Joan Vollmer in the head)
Maybe Rachel's behavior seems honest and sane and reasonable to herself. Who knows. Her brain is very much a "black box"...we can't see the process, just the final result.
Oh, I think she thinks she appears to care about me deeply. To her, that's about as close as you get to honesty.
DeleteI was wondering why the crowdfunding campaign is still up in your name and verified email address and accepting money. Where does that money go if anyone donates? Why not put an update on that page and let people know what's up about Haywire being a scheming capitalist pig?
ReplyDeleteIt's still accepting money!?!?! Holy shit, I have to fix that. It's going straight into Rachel's PayPal account and then who knows.
Delete(thanks for the tip, Jeebus H. on a pogo stick)
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1bquctgLZc
ReplyDeleteWhen was this recorded?
ReplyDeletehttps://vimeo.com/136769461
Hi Guys
ReplyDeleteThis blog is by Matt Forney's ex girlfriend. Matt Forney is a misogynist Alt-Right white supremacist known for defaming and attacking woman. If you are using this page to defame Rachel Haywire, you are supporting Matt Forney, a sexist neo-nazi pig who runs Return of Kings with Roosh V (you may remember him as a rapist Alt-Right guy). Sterzinger is also Alt-Right and (according to Matt Forney after he dumped her, an alcoholic who had a lesbian affair with Rachel Haywire)> get all the facts before sharing this page, Forney and Sterzinger are gutter trash neo-nutzis.
Sternizinger's page on White Nationalist blog Counter Currents:https://counter-currents.com/tag/ann-sterzinger/
ReplyDeleteRachel was also part of said movement, and has a history of dating nazis and drug use too. What’s your point? Didn’t she publish a book under a nazbols book publishing company at that?
ReplyDeleteDude, don’t bash alcoholism when Rachel appears on YouTube drugged out of her mind for professional interviews. https://youtu.be/3fLpAxO-1nw
ReplyDeleteYou realize how hypocritical said trashing you’re doing is? Forney is a piece of trash, and Anne admits it now too.
The simping is strong with this one. 😂
ReplyDeletehttps://arktos.com/people/alexander-dugin/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.amazon.com/New-Reaction-Rachel-Haywire-2015-02-24/dp/B01FKU5400
Take note of the publishing company.
None of this even has to do with what was confronted in the article, and just ad hominem attacks. And a sad attempt to demonize anybody sharing legitimate details that did occur with the Trigger Warning fundraiser controversy.
funny how this got posted after she threatened to sue over an astral attack.and it went public. pissing off a lot of people. this isn’t a simp it’s rachel. she has accused others of addiction and made false political attacks to. Im sure i can dig up more about her stint in the altright too! and her own drug use. lmao
ReplyDeleteHereis a review of her nazbol book from counter currents. which she used against anne for writing for 😂😂😂 https://counter-currents.com/2015/03/its-trad-dad/
ReplyDeletehttps://attackthesystem.com/2013/04/04/fightin-words/
ReplyDelete😂😂😂
Yet shes attacking others for bein the movement
https://medium.com/i-m-h-o/i-am-not-a-woman-in-tech-dbe596b7be4b
ReplyDeleteAnother altright article written by Rachel
not inly did she steal money from ann she did from “fans” see the reviews https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/machinekuntrecords/sanity-is-slavery
ReplyDeleteAutismIsNotYourPocketbook
ReplyDeleteImagine pandering to a misunderstood, and marginalized community the autistic community, in the hopes of gaining “fans”— https://youtu.be/VHOne9XIlM4 essentially filling their pocket books on the isolation most autistics feel, while begging THEM for pocket change for fraudulent go fundmes, I believe they are banned from the site now too? This is just what I’m told though. For all of their “health problems (their mother lives in a gated community and her father was a worker for a very prominent lawyer. (she is far from middle class according to people who have known her in real life - so I hear). Two exes have come forward and said she was always covered for medical expenses by said mother she accuses of abuses consistently to friends and those who barely know her alike- me being the latter. Both exes stated said person also routinely lied to their own mother for money too. Supposedly. Maybe they were both just jaded for some reason? Last I heard she was using bitcoin to revive slums in Africa for Children making art. But there was no information as to who the money went to, nor how much the children making said art received. And since releasing said project, said person has deleted all their most recently active Social media sites. Some might say “they smell a rat”. But this may be PURE coincidence.
ReplyDeleteAlso the person mentioned in the article has gone on record on several podcasts, you should be able to find said content on various sites, of her defending TERFs and their right to free speech, yet when antifa released content of her’s, now claiming that “they were just trolling” (including articles on alt-right.com and a neo nazi web forum. They cried about it to their “followers”. Claiming “ Antifa were the real NAZIS!”. If you don’t believe me, contact Antifa about the person in question, and what they uncovered. You may be able to find these listings if you use a go back app for their old Twitter, where they also accused antifa of attacking them again- except said person tagged them first, and started the second round of fighting, by initial appearances. But my memory could be fuzzy, so double check yourself, and correct me if I’m wrong, which I MIGHT be.
This also included a then writer, and was also manager of Augustus Inviticus’ Facebook page, and then writer for his newsletter. Who was a major player in Unite the Right. And has revently faced major charges for stalking, battery, and various other laws violated (feel free to research this). Said writer to my knowledge, is also hiding her past behind her by recently joining a hinduism cult. Or so I’ve seen on her FB profile. but if you search far back enough, you can see her articles and writing for Trigger Warning and Augustus on her very same profile. Even going so far as to view the past with the latter with “nostalgia” for her past after it was brought up as an attack during a Facebook fight, not regret. At most she has stated “I wrote for anybody who was willing publish to my work.” It has been her immediate retort whenever said accusations are brought up. But that’s just what I’M reading into into what she has repeatedly said, as did as did the person in question, until outright denying having any relationship to the alt-right. Make up your own minds and conclusions regarding this.
ReplyDeleteWhich begs the question: If Ann is such an unredeemable neo-nazi and those reposting this link, why was she the main writer of said person’s site? Again, this is just what I HEAR, so it’s not coming from ME. Maybe it’s all just gossip?
They also didn’t leave the alt-right until the disastrous Trigger Warning fundraiser (unlike the NRx movement, according to an ex associate, as she was still trying to suck up to Nick Land and get more money out Peter Thiel, via his conventions, one of which was taking place in New Orleans in 2020 according to the texts I was sent, from said ex associate and person in question kept bringing up “There will be a lot of men there, with a lot of money.” Was this how she tried to hook her into the idea of attending? I suppose as a wing woman of sorts? Maybe she was just hoping to cash in and is no longer part of the NRx movement? After the failed Trigger Warning website and the disastrous fundraiser as mentioned here. According to rumors, Thiel even donated to said fundraiser, but hasn’t been involved in said person’s projects to date. Possibly due to the controversy and mismanagement rumored to be caused by said person in the article too. As Thiel has shown himself to be a very shrewd mind and avoids controversy. No matter what you think of his politics. She was last claiming a project of her’s even donated to MAPs, which he is associated with. One MIGHT think out of desperation of being noticed by Mr. Thiel again? But that’s just rumors, once again. Maybe said ex associate also has an axe to grind? There seem to be a lot of those regarding the person in question to date,
though.
Yet I must say: It’s not only sadly ironic that either a crony of the person said article is about, or it was the very said person the article was about, would the alt-right movement and those who took part in it- which there is undeniable proof they were a part of said movement. And the attacks they made against Ann’s alcohol use. When according to former colleagues and loved ones, I’ve spoken to of the person in question have attested said person has a supposed xanax and cocaine problem. Again, it could be bad blood. But Supposedly, she’s been in rehabilitation programs since her departure from the public sphere in late 2000s; causing her sudden and unexpected turn from the public sphere since then. When she seemed to be peaking with her “Philosophy Queens” segment and her popular and well recieved web hosting events again. But once again, I’m only a rumor peddler, so take everything I’ve said with a grain a salt. Either way, I hope the subject of the article got the help they needed. 🤫
ReplyDeleteMy apologies for the typos unneeded spaces. This didn’t seem to transfer well from Facebook; as I had to break apart just to fit into the comments section.
ReplyDeleteAlso, thank you Ann for telling your story. We may not see eye to eye on politics. But it took real bravery to tell off the “not scammer” and “not psycho ex” to screw off. You’re much more talented than either of them. Hence why you suffered their simultaneous narcissistic abuse and toxic co-dependency. While they LARPED at playing alphas- where nobody else outside of their spheres would, and ever will, see them as such. Again, I’m just kidding. So no serious damages were done. 😉
she is going by rachel dezarra. the supposed person this is about now. just a heads up to i guess cover her previous tracks
ReplyDeleteRachel’s site Trigger Warning is back from the dead and features an article with this said writer. If she is to be dismissed because of her background, Rachel just showcased she was involved with said crowd too. So why does her word even matter if that is the reasoning?
ReplyDelete